|
|
| Author |
Message |
Patrick
Administrator
Joined: 16 Mar 2001
Posts: 14799
Location: Harbinger, NC, U.S.A.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YaBoy#9
Top Prospect
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 50
Location: ATX
|
 Posted: 7/24/2008, 11:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Steven Jackson- Rams, team may not be all that great, but they cant do much without him
_________________
Dallas Stars-Dallas Cowboys-Texas Rangers-Texas Longhorns |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2162
|
| Posted: 7/26/2008, 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was kind of surprised to see Hasselbeck and Eli Manning on the list. Neither of them really strike me as irreplaceble players.
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SteelersRule26426
Veteran
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 197
|
| Posted: 8/4/2008, 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was a pretty good list even though
I don't think any offensive lineman should be
ahead of Matt Hasselback or Steven Jackson who
I agree should be on the list. I really can't see the
Seahawks or Rams having any kind of success without
those guys. Also, I may be a little biased, but I think Big
Ben is way better than Eli Manning and is more indispensable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2162
|
| Posted: 8/5/2008, 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
After seeing what happened when Willie Roaf retired, I think that seeing an offensive lineman on that list is not too far out of place.
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
madrascal32
Prospect
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: 8/12/2008, 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think DeMeco Ryans should have been on there.
_________________
Houston Texans-Houston Astros-Texas Rangers-Houston Rockets-San Antonio Spurs-Texas Longhorns |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jkopp984
Prospect
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: 8/15/2008, 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SteelersRule26426 wrote: |
I thought it was a pretty good list even though
I don't think any offensive lineman should be
ahead of Matt Hasselback or Steven Jackson who
I agree should be on the list. I really can't see the
Seahawks or Rams having any kind of success without
those guys. Also, I may be a little biased, but I think Big
Ben is way better than Eli Manning and is more indispensable. |
I don't think being more or less indispensable has to do with who is better or not. I think we would all agree that Roethlisberger is better than Eli, but the Steelers could survive better than the Giants if both their QBs went down. The Steelers are known better as a running team with a strong defense, not sure what you'd call the Giants at this point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shamedog18
Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 2589
Location: Long Island
|
| Posted: 8/16/2008, 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I would say though that if I had to pick one guy who the Giants absolutely couldn't do without, it'd be Plaxico Burress. I think losing him would hurt more than losing Manning. If you lose Burress, and then have only Amani Toomer and a bunch of #4 and #5 receivers to throw to, it won't matter who the quarterback is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SteelersRule26426
Veteran
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 197
|
| Posted: 8/18/2008, 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shamedog18 wrote: |
| I would say though that if I had to pick one guy who the Giants absolutely couldn't do without, it'd be Plaxico Burress. I think losing him would hurt more than losing Manning. If you lose Burress, and then have only Amani Toomer and a bunch of #4 and #5 receivers to throw to, it won't matter who the quarterback is. |
I totally agree. Another guy who I'd say is more indispensable is Osi Umenyiora. The Giants pass rush is the no.1 reason they were able to win the Super Bowl. I could see the Giants still winning without Eli. They have a good running game and very good defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
