|
|
| Author |
Message |
Jonas_b
Prospect
Joined: 05 Dec 2009
Posts: 4
Location: Stockholm
|
 Posted: 12/5/2009, 2:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| shamedog18 wrote: |
| I think the NHL should try to do something about these long term contracts. Luongo himself may be worth it, but I think overall these kind of deals could end up being bad for the game. |
I agree, these deals are just ridiculous.
_________________
Go Leafs Go |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BuffSabres9
Prospect
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: 2/9/2010, 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah this was a good move by the Canucks, this guy is sturdy in net and i watched him the other day against the bruins despite the couple goals he looks strong in net for the Canucks...good move |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Patrick
Administrator
Joined: 16 Mar 2001
Posts: 18860
Location: Harbinger, NC, U.S.A.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
saintsfanshop
Prospect
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 12
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baskerva
Prospect
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 35
Location: MD
|
| Posted: 2/14/2010, 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's crazy to lock ANYONE up for 12 years. I know he is a good player and all but come on. Why does hockey always have crazy contracts. By the time they get dominate they are in their 30's usually and then you lock them up until they are 42? crazy.
_________________
http://sportsatorium.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to have you.
