|
|
| Author |
Message |
Marck024
Prospect
Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: 7/6/2009, 7:44 pm Post subject: LeBron < Kobe |
 |
|
| Lets hear some of your thoughts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
twiceasnice
Prospect
Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frostx
Prospect
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: 7/6/2009, 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kobe's good but he's past his prime, Lebron will be much better than Kobe in due time.....
_________________
The Ultimate Sport Source |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SportsAC
Veteran
Joined: 11 May 2009
Posts: 260
|
| Posted: 7/7/2009, 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Toss up really....though over the next few years that will probably change. Lebron just doesn't quite have a supporting cast at this point in his career.
_________________
Love the Mavs, Cowboys, and Rangers, but live out on the West Coast...
www.TransplantFans.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScoobyEuph13
Prospect
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: 7/8/2009, 8:56 pm Post subject: LeBron<Kobe |
|
|
This a great argument of who is better. Here is my opinion. They are both good and are true players. The one obvious thing is Kobe has 'Rings' and LeBron doesn't.
I think Kobe is better than LeBron, especially when Kobe first entered the NBA. LeBron is a terrific player, but it is a sly off of Kobe's athleticism.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
VIP
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 3172
|
| Posted: 7/8/2009, 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the little I see, I'd take Lebron. When all is said and done, this guy will probably go down as one of the best to have played the game. He hasn't won a ring yet, but he lots of time. And I think he is a better player than Kobe, and he isn't a distraction, which is a big pro for him.
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScoobyEuph13
Prospect
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: 7/9/2009, 11:34 am Post subject: LeBron<Kobe |
|
|
Well, my favorite player is Kobe. He is not a "dirty" player like most NBA players.
LeBron, I have to say is one of the best "all around" players in the NBA right now.
Another thing is, people need to stop comparing them two. They don't play the same position. It is like comparing Dwight Howard to Derek Fisher. It just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BristolBaller
Hall of Famer
Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 633
Location: Middlefield, Ohio
|
| Posted: 7/9/2009, 6:57 pm Post subject: Re: LeBron<Kobe |
|
|
| ScoobyEuph13 wrote: |
Well, my favorite player is Kobe. He is not a "dirty" player like most NBA players.
LeBron, I have to say is one of the best "all around" players in the NBA right now.
Another thing is, people need to stop comparing them two. They don't play the same position. It is like comparing Dwight Howard to Derek Fisher. It just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. |
Well said...not only do they not play the same postion(though they are similar in height,only difference of a couple inches), but they have different types of games...Kobe is more the scorer and finisher...while LeBron is more a facilitator, then he will score if need be...he's starting to develop the art of finishing that Kobe has got down pat...though at the moment i have to say LeBron is better overall as a player...better passer and rebounder...mainly because how many championships you've won shouldn't be in this discussion because thats more about the team around them...if the discussion included championships it'd be Kobe hands down
_________________
INDIANS....Finally the season has ended
BROWNS..UGH
CAVS..."win a ring for the king" Shaq says
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL...Down goes Penn State >img src="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif" alt="">
OHIO STATE BASKETBALL...Seasons getting closer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScoobyEuph13
Prospect
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: 7/10/2009, 9:13 am Post subject: LeBron<Kobe |
|
|
You're right about the championships. It is all about the team. But like Stan Van Gundy said in the Game 5 press conference, he doesn't know of any team who has won a championship without good players. Let's think of the past 10 years or so.
Lakers had- Shaq and Kobe when they won 3 championships together.
Pistons had- The Wallace's, Rip, and everyone else.
The Spurs had- Tim Duncan, Ginoboli, Parker, Horry, etc.
Celtics had- Garnett, Allen, Pierce, etc.
Now the Lakers had- Kobe, Gasol, Odom, Fisher, Ariza as the starting lineup. (I knew they would win this year.)
So I challenge anyone to tell me about a team that won without great players.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BristolBaller
Hall of Famer
Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 633
Location: Middlefield, Ohio
|
| Posted: 7/10/2009, 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There isn't any ...ecspecailly these days with the players being as athletic and skilled as they are, you have to have at least 2 if not 3 at least all-star players or better to win or sometimes even contend for a championship
_________________
INDIANS....Finally the season has ended
BROWNS..UGH
CAVS..."win a ring for the king" Shaq says
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL...Down goes Penn State >img src="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif" alt="">
OHIO STATE BASKETBALL...Seasons getting closer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
