|
|
| Author |
Message |
nailedanother1
Prospect
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 3
|
 Posted: 5/14/2007, 12:49 pm Post subject: Can they do it? |
 |
|
It's a must win for the Suns. If they go down 3-1 against the Spurs there is no way they can come back against that. Is it possible for them to win game 4 on the road? I think so and should be the most exciting games of the year. I at least hope the Suns win because i would love to see it go to game 7.
_________________
Come join InsideNation, it's a fun competitive way to bet on sports. Win Huge cash prizes, Right now it's FREE. http://www.insidenation.com/?ref=nailedanother1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Caboose
Prospect
Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: 5/14/2007, 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im pulling for the suns to get this road win at spurs
being a good of team as they are i think they can handle the spurs even though they are on the road
_________________
Show me a guy whos afraid to look bad, and I'll show you a guy you can beat every time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1211
|
| Posted: 5/15/2007, 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think this series will go to 7 games, but I think the Spurs will edge out the Suns in the end.
How do you feel about how rough this series is getting between these two teams? The tempers are boiling more and more each game. It makes for a good rivalry, and makes it more fun to watch. That is easy for me to say, though, because I don't have an interest in either of the teams involved. So, do you enjoy this rivalry? Is it good for the game, or is this coming out the wrong way?
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Caboose
Prospect
Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: 5/15/2007, 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
with all thats happened to steve nash im seeing some bad blood coming up
_________________
Show me a guy whos afraid to look bad, and I'll show you a guy you can beat every time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jroc
Prospect
Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: 5/15/2007, 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's almost as if they're intentionally trying to taking nash out...? 
i'm pulling for the suns as well. i'm pretty confident in the suns taking game 5 even without stoudemire making game six a definite watch. i'm going for suns again in game six simply because stoudemire will be looking to take names  . plus suns won't have to worry about an horry save two seconds before the end game.
_________________
http://thegolditsin.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hardworker4
Prospect
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: 5/16/2007, 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am pulling for the Suns also. I don't know if they can do it without Stoudemire and Diaw. The Suns usually just play 7 guys and now they are down to 5 everyday players. There bench is going to have to step up big time for them to pull this out. On another note, the rule needs to be changed, because neither Stoudemire nor Diaw should have been suspended. I wouldn't be surprised if it is changed after the playoffs are over.
_________________
Team over Talent |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1211
|
| Posted: 5/16/2007, 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The rule was fine during the regular season...and I think it is still fine now. I think the rule should stand, and I really hope that it doesn't get changed next season. Playoffs or regular season, it should still remain the same. The guys have to know that there will still be consequences for their actions, and they have to take responsibility for them.
As for the Spurs trying to take out Nash, well, you could argue a case either way, as to whether it is intentional or not. Remember, though, what the Suns were like when Nash was missing for a time during the regular season? Strategy may be a key, here.
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hardworker4
Prospect
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: 5/17/2007, 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
So you think what Stoudemire and Diaw did waranted a one game suspension??? They didn't come within 10 feet of altercation and never really left the sidelin. Ok, maybe you fine them but that's it. If you give Stoudemire and Diaw one game for what they did, in comparison to what Horry did, Horry should get 4 or 5 games. The rule needs to be changed, just listen to to all the analysts on tv, many former players even say the same thing.
_________________
Team over Talent |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead-Red
Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1211
|
| Posted: 5/18/2007, 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just because former players and analysts don't like the rule, doesn't really warrant a change. I see this kind of thing all the time, working with Law Enforcement. Everyone likes cops, until one writes you a ticket.
_________________
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hardworker4
Prospect
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: 5/18/2007, 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Overtime rules change in everything you talk about. Just like the NCAA moving back the 3 point line. The rule that got Stoudemire and Diaw suspended will be changed or at least re-worded so something like this wont happen again.
_________________
Team over Talent |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Register
Profile
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Contact
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
